Peran Rekognisi Atasan dalam Pengaruh E-Kinerja dan Kompetensi Digital terhadap Kinerja PNS

Authors

  • Andi Benbella Universitas Tamansiswa Padang
  • Hafrizal Okta Ade Putra Universitas Tamansiswa Padang
  • Didi Aryadi Universitas Tamansiswa Padang

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.62194/fadks955

Keywords:

E-Kinerja, Kompetensi Digital, Rekognisi atasan, Kinerja PNS, PLS-SEM

Abstract

Penelitian ini bertujuan menganalisis pengaruh implementasi E-Kinerja dan kompetensi digital terhadap kinerja Pegawai Negeri Sipil (PNS) di Polda Sumatera Barat, serta menguji peran rekognisi atasan sebagai moderator. Penelitian menggunakan pendekatan kuantitatif dengan desain explanatory research. Populasi sekaligus sampel penelitian terdiri atas 176 PNS di lingkungan Polda Sumatera Barat dengan teknik sampel jenuh. Data dikumpulkan menggunakan kuesioner skala Likert 1–5 dan dianalisis menggunakan Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM) dengan SmartPLS 4. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa implementasi E-Kinerja berpengaruh positif dan signifikan terhadap kinerja PNS (β=0,373; t=5,045; p<0,001), demikian pula kompetensi digital (β=0,491; t=5,490; p<0,001). Rekognisi atasan tidak berpengaruh langsung secara signifikan terhadap kinerja PNS (β=0,083; t=1,771; p=0,077). Namun, rekognisi atasan terbukti memperkuat pengaruh implementasi E-Kinerja terhadap kinerja PNS (β=0,133; t=2,335; p=0,020). Sebaliknya, interaksi rekognisi atasan dan kompetensi digital signifikan tetapi berarah negatif (β=-0,281; t=4,962; p<0,001), sehingga hipotesis penguatan tidak didukung. Model final menjelaskan 79,7% variasi kinerja PNS (R²=0,797; adjusted R²=0,791). Temuan menegaskan bahwa kompetensi digital merupakan prediktor langsung paling dominan, sementara rekognisi atasan lebih berperan sebagai kondisi kontekstual yang mengubah kekuatan hubungan faktor digital dengan kinerja.

References

Ben Moussa, N., & El Arbi, R. (2020). The impact of human resources information systems on individual innovation capability in Tunisian companies: The moderating role of affective commitment. European Research on Management and Business Economics, 26(1), 18-25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iedeen.2019.12.001

Bhattacherjee, A. (2001). Understanding information systems continuance: An expectation-confirmation model. MIS Quarterly, 25(3), 351-370. https://doi.org/10.2307/3250921

Blanka, C., Krumay, B., & Rueckel, D. (2022). The interplay of digital transformation and employee competency: A design science approach. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 178, 121575. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2022.121575

Bondarouk, T., & Ruel, H. J. M. (2009). Electronic human resource management: Challenges in the digital era. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 20(3), 505-514. https://doi.org/10.1080/09585190802707235

Bradler, C., Dur, R., Neckermann, S., & Non, A. (2016). Employee recognition and performance: A field experiment. Management Science, 62(11), 3085-3099. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2015.2291

Brun, J.-P., & Dugas, N. (2008). An analysis of employee recognition: Perspectives on human resources practices. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 19(4), 716-730. https://doi.org/10.1080/09585190801953723

Carretero, S., Vuorikari, R., & Punie, Y. (2017). DigComp 2.1: The digital competence framework for citizens with eight proficiency levels and examples of use. Publications Office of the European Union. https://doi.org/10.2760/38842

Carvalho, L. P. de, Poleto, T., Ramos, C. C., Rodrigues, F. de A., Carvalho, V. D. H. de, & Nepomuceno, T. C. C. (2023). Predictors of digital competence of public university employees and the impact on innovative work behavior. Administrative Sciences, 13(5), 131. https://doi.org/10.3390/admsci13050131

Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 13(3), 319-340. https://doi.org/10.2307/249008

DeLone, W. H., & McLean, E. R. (1992). Information systems success: The quest for the dependent variable. Information Systems Research, 3(1), 60-95. https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.3.1.60

DeLone, W. H., & McLean, E. R. (2003). The DeLone and McLean model of information systems success: A ten-year update. Journal of Management Information Systems, 19(4), 9-30. https://doi.org/10.1080/07421222.2003.11045748

Eisenberger, R., Stinglhamber, F., Vandenberghe, C., Sucharski, I. L., & Rhoades, L. (2002). Perceived supervisor support: Contributions to perceived organizational support and employee retention. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87(3), 565-573. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.87.3.565

Gerstner, C. R., & Day, D. V. (1997). Meta-analytic review of leader-member exchange theory: Correlates and construct issues. Journal of Applied Psychology, 82(6), 827-844. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.82.6.827

Goodhue, D. L., & Thompson, R. L. (1995). Task-technology fit and individual performance. MIS Quarterly, 19(2), 213-236. https://doi.org/10.2307/249689

Hair, J. F., Hult, G. T. M., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2022). A primer on partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM) (3rd ed.). SAGE.

Hair, J. F., Risher, J. J., Sarstedt, M., & Ringle, C. M. (2019). When to use and how to report the results of PLS-SEM. European Business Review, 31(1), 2-24. https://doi.org/10.1108/EBR-11-2018-0203

Henseler, J., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2015). A new criterion for assessing discriminant validity in variance-based structural equation modeling. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 43, 115-135. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-014-0403-8

Ilomaki, L., Paavola, S., Lakkala, M., & Kantosalo, A. (2016). Digital competence: An emergent boundary concept for policy and educational research. Education and Information Technologies, 21(3), 655-679. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-014-9346-4

Ingsih, K., Astuti, S. D., & Riyanto, F. (2024). The role of digital competence in improving service quality and employee performance. SA Journal of Human Resource Management, 22, a2689. https://doi.org/10.4102/sajhrm.v22i0.2689

Jo, H., & Shin, D. (2025). The impact of recognition, fairness, and leadership on employee outcomes: A large-scale multi-group analysis. PLOS ONE, 20(1), e0312951. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0312951

Koopmans, L., Bernaards, C. M., Hildebrandt, V. H., de Vet, H. C. W., & van der Beek, A. J. (2014). Measuring individual work performance: Identifying and selecting indicators. Work, 48(2), 229-238. https://doi.org/10.3233/WOR-131659

Kosfeld, M., & Neckermann, S. (2011). Getting more work for nothing? Symbolic awards and worker performance. American Economic Journal: Microeconomics, 3(3), 86-99. https://doi.org/10.1257/mic.3.3.86

Kurniasih, D., Setyoko, P. I., & Saputra, A. S. (2022). The influence of digital electronic performance, competence and motivation on government organization employees performance during the digital era. Journal of Industrial Engineering & Management Research, 3(5), 86-99. https://doi.org/10.7777/jiemar.v3i5.403

Kuvaas, B. (2006). Performance appraisal satisfaction and employee outcomes: Mediating and moderating roles of work motivation. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 17(3), 504-522. https://doi.org/10.1080/09585190500521581

Lapuente, V., & Van de Walle, S. (2020). The effects of new public management on the quality of public services. Governance, 33(3), 461-475. https://doi.org/10.1111/gove.12502

Li, Y., & Shang, H. (2020). Service quality, perceived value, and citizens' continuous-use intention regarding e-government: Empirical evidence from China. Information & Management, 57(3), 103197. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2019.103197

Martin, R., Guillaume, Y., Thomas, G., Lee, A., & Epitropaki, O. (2016). Leader-member exchange and performance: A meta-analytic review. Personnel Psychology, 69(1), 67-121. https://doi.org/10.1111/peps.12100

Mohammadyari, S., & Singh, H. (2015). Understanding the effect of e-learning on individual performance: The role of digital literacy. Computers & Education, 82, 11-25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2014.10.025

Ng, W. (2012). Can we teach digital natives digital literacy? Computers & Education, 59(3), 1065-1078. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2012.04.016

Parry, E., & Tyson, S. (2011). Desired goals and actual outcomes of e-HRM. Human Resource Management Journal, 21(3), 335-354. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1748-8583.2010.00149.x

Petter, S., DeLone, W., & McLean, E. (2008). Measuring information systems success: Models, dimensions, measures, and interrelationships. European Journal of Information Systems, 17, 236-263. https://doi.org/10.1057/ejis.2008.15

Rhoades, L., & Eisenberger, R. (2002). Perceived organizational support: A review of the literature. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87(4), 698-714. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.87.4.698

Shanock, L. R., & Eisenberger, R. (2006). When supervisors feel supported: Relationships with subordinates' perceived supervisor support, perceived organizational support, and performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 91(3), 689-695. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.91.3.689

Strohmeier, S. (2007). Research in e-HRM: Review and implications. Human Resource Management Review, 17(1), 19-37. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hrmr.2006.11.002

Troshani, I., Jerram, C., & Hill, S. R. (2011). Exploring the public sector adoption of HRIS. Industrial Management & Data Systems, 111(3), 470-488. https://doi.org/10.1108/02635571111118314

Tumija, T., & Bukit, D. (2023). Performance appraisal among civil servants through electronic performance (e-performance) at Badan Kepegawaian Daerah of Karo Regency, North Sumatera Province. Jurnal MSDA (Manajemen Sumber Daya Aparatur), 11(1). https://doi.org/10.33701/jmsda.v11i1.3104

van Laar, E., van Deursen, A. J. A. M., van Dijk, J. A. G. M., & de Haan, J. (2017). The relation between 21st-century skills and digital skills: A systematic literature review. Computers in Human Behavior, 72, 577-588. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2017.03.010

Vuorikari, R., Kluzer, S., & Punie, Y. (2022). DigComp 2.2: The digital competence framework for citizens: With new examples of knowledge, skills and attitudes. Publications Office of the European Union. https://doi.org/10.2760/115376

Downloads

Submitted

2026-08-19

Accepted

2026-10-05

Published

2026-10-08

How to Cite

Benbella, A., Putra, H. O. A., & Aryadi, D. (2026). Peran Rekognisi Atasan dalam Pengaruh E-Kinerja dan Kompetensi Digital terhadap Kinerja PNS. Journal of Global Economic Research, 3(3), 148-160. https://doi.org/10.62194/fadks955

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Benbella, A., Putra, H. O. A., & Aryadi, D. (2026). Peran Rekognisi Atasan dalam Pengaruh E-Kinerja dan Kompetensi Digital terhadap Kinerja PNS. Journal of Global Economic Research, 3(3), 148-160. https://doi.org/10.62194/fadks955

Similar Articles

11-16 of 16

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.