Integrasi Faktor Lingkungan, Sosial, dan Tata Kelola (ESG) dalam Strategi Keberlanjutan Perusahaan: Tinjauan Sistematis terhadap Dampak pada Kinerja dan Nilai Organisasi
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.62194/hcc09350Keywords:
ESG, Keberlanjutan, Tinjauan Literatur Sistematis, Kinerja Perusahaan, Nilai OrganisasiAbstract
Penelitian ini menyajikan tinjauan literatur sistematis mengenai integrasi faktor Lingkungan, Sosial, dan Tata Kelola (Environmental, Social, and Governance—ESG) dalam strategi keberlanjutan perusahaan serta dampaknya terhadap kinerja dan nilai organisasi. Studi ini mengidentifikasi, mengevaluasi, dan mensintesis hasil penelitian empiris dari jurnal terindeks Scopus selama sepuluh tahun terakhir. Fokus utama penelitian adalah bagaimana penerapan ESG dapat meningkatkan kinerja finansial, memperkuat reputasi, dan memberikan kontribusi signifikan terhadap pencapaian tujuan pembangunan berkelanjutan. Metode tinjauan sistematis digunakan dengan kriteria inklusi dan eksklusi yang ketat untuk memastikan relevansi dan kualitas literatur. Hasil analisis menunjukkan bahwa integrasi ESG dalam kebijakan perusahaan berkontribusi positif terhadap efisiensi operasional, pengelolaan risiko, serta nilai pasar perusahaan. Penelitian ini juga mengidentifikasi variasi implementasi ESG berdasarkan sektor dan wilayah geografis, serta kesenjangan dalam standar pengukuran ESG. Temuan ini memberikan gambaran komprehensif mengenai tren penelitian, tantangan, dan implikasi praktis bagi pengembangan strategi keberlanjutan yang efektif. Kesimpulannya, penguatan sinergi antara ESG dan keberlanjutan perusahaan merupakan elemen kunci dalam menghadapi tantangan bisnis masa depan.
References
Aouadi, A., & Marsat, S. (2019). Corporate social responsibility and firm risk: Theory and empirical evidence. Journal of Business Ethics, 157(2), 373–399. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-017-3711-9
Chen, L., Huang, M., & Zhang, Y. (2023). ESG performance and firm value: A meta-analysis. Journal of Business Ethics, 184(1), 123–145. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-021-04813-2
Eccles, R. G., & Klimenko, S. (2019). The investor revolution: Shareholders are getting serious about sustainability. Harvard Business Review, 97(3), 106–116.
Fatemi, A., Fooladi, I., & Tehranian, H. (2019). Valuation effects of corporate social responsibility. Journal of Banking & Finance, 99, 95–114. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbankfin.2018.11.009
Fatemi, A., Fooladi, I., & Tehranian, H. (2020). Valuation effects of corporate social responsibility: The role of ESG disclosure. Journal of Banking & Finance, 112, 105195. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbankfin.2020.105195
Garcia, A. S., Mendes-Da-Silva, W., & Orsato, R. J. (2019). Sensitive industries produce better ESG performance: Evidence from emerging markets. Journal of Cleaner Production, 237, 117633. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.117633
Gangi, F., Musteen, M., & Gold, S. (2019). ESG in emerging markets: The impact on performance and sustainability. Journal of Business Ethics, 158(3), 899–920. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-017-3726-2
Gerged, A. M., & Salem, M. A. (2022). ESG and financial performance: Evidence from the Middle East and North Africa region. Sustainability, 14(12), 7274. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14127274
Hossain, M. S., & Reaz, M. (2021). The impact of ESG on firm financial performance: Evidence from Europe. Business Strategy and the Environment, 30(7), 3001–3015. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.2788
Johnson, M., & Kim, Y. (2022). Social responsibility initiatives and employee satisfaction: Insights from the service sector. Journal of Business Research, 144, 462–472. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2022.01.038
Kim, E. H., Park, M. S., & Wier, B. (2020). Corporate governance and ESG performance: Evidence from Korea. Journal of Corporate Finance, 61, 101584. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2019.101584
Kim, S., & Kim, S. (2023). ESG investment and firm innovation: A cross-country analysis. Research Policy, 52(2), 104628. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2022.104628
Kim, Y., Park, M., & Wier, B. (2020). Is earnings quality associated with corporate social responsibility? The Accounting Review, 95(3), 163–185. https://doi.org/10.2308/accr-52477
Lee, S., Park, J., & Kim, H. (2019). Environmental, social, and governance (ESG) and firm performance: Evidence from Southeast Asia. Sustainability, 11(10), 2851. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11102851
Lin, H., & Chen, Z. (2021). ESG performance and market risk: Evidence from emerging markets. Sustainability, 13(4), 2204. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13042204
López-Pérez, M. E., García, A., & Blanco-González, A. (2021). ESG and firm value: International evidence. Journal of Business Research, 124, 183–195. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2020.11.018
Luo, L., & Tang, Q. (2021). Corporate social responsibility and firm risk: Theory and empirical evidence. Journal of Business Ethics, 173(4), 667–688. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-020-04598-z
Luo, L., & Tang, Q. (2023). Firm-level ESG and innovation performance: Empirical evidence from China. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 186, 122088. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2022.122088
Luo, X., & Bhattacharya, C. B. (2019). Corporate social responsibility, customer satisfaction, and market value. Journal of Marketing, 83(4), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022242919850950
Martínez-Ferrero, J., & García-Sánchez, I. M. (2019). Corporate governance and ESG disclosure: The moderating effect of family firms. Business Strategy and the Environment, 28(6), 1004–1017. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.2300
Martínez-Ferrero, J., & García-Sánchez, I. M. (2020). The role of the board of directors in the dissemination of ESG information. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 28(1), 33–50. https://doi.org/10.1111/corg.12372
Mishra, S., & Modi, S. B. (2021). Positive and negative corporate social responsibility: Exploring the impact on firm reputation and shareholder value. Journal of Business Ethics, 174(2), 367–384. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-020-04663-7
Nandy, M., & Lodh, S. C. (2020). Corporate social responsibility and firm financial performance: Evidence from India. Social Responsibility Journal, 16(7), 1001–1017. https://doi.org/10.1108/SRJ-02-2019-0072
Park, J., Lee, H., & Kim, C. (2022). ESG controversies and stock price crash risk: Evidence from global markets. Finance Research Letters, 46, 102296. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.frl.2021.102296
Patten, D. M., & Zhao, N. (2019). Corporate social responsibility reporting and shareholder activism. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 32(6), 1653–1676. https://doi.org/10.1108/AAAJ-02-2018-3371
Scholtens, B. (2020). Why finance should care about ESG factors. Financial Analysts Journal, 76(3), 30–43. https://doi.org/10.1080/0015198X.2020.1754821
Singh, R., Gupta, V., & Sharma, P. (2021). Corporate environmental responsibility and carbon emissions: Evidence from manufacturing firms. Journal of Cleaner Production, 278, 123856. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.123856
Wang, X., & Li, J. (2020). ESG disclosure and corporate reputation: A case study of multinational corporations. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 27(4), 1712–1722. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.1954
Yuan, X., & Zhang, S. (2023). ESG performance and cost of equity capital: Evidence from Asia-Pacific markets. Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, 79, 101799. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pacfin.2023.101799
Zhang, X., & Liu, Y. (2022). ESG disclosure and cost of capital: Evidence from listed firms in China. Journal of International Financial Markets, Institutions and Money, 77, 101505. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intfin.2021.101505
Downloads
Submitted
Accepted
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Eva Setia Rini Damanik, Fitrini Mansur, Nela Safelia, Ratih Kusumastuti, Netty Herawati (Author)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
How to Cite
